Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • O openapi-generator
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 3,476
    • Issues 3,476
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 402
    • Merge requests 402
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Package Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • OpenAPI Tools
  • openapi-generator
  • Merge requests
  • !10100

[dart2] Include request body on DELETE call

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Administrator requested to merge github/fork/yholkamp/patch-1 into master Aug 05, 2021
  • Overview 0
  • Commits 2
  • Pipelines 0
  • Changes 4

Created by: yholkamp

This change updates the generated ApiClient to include the request body on DELETE calls. Per the RFC on page 2, DELETE calls are allowed to have a request body, even though the behavior may be undefined. I've not come across many APIs that use this behavior but there are a few, in particular the Ory Kratos API does so, not forwarding the body prevents such an API from being used. An API method that does not define a request body should continue to function as expected as the body would be null in that scenario.

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package 
    ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    Commit all changed files. This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master. These must match the expectations made by your contribution. You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*. For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • File the PR against the correct branch: master, 5.3.x, 6.0.x
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

@jaumard (2018/09) @josh-burton (2019/12) @amondnet (2019/12) @sbu-WBT (2020/12) @kuhnroyal (2020/12) @agilob (2020/12)

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: github/fork/yholkamp/patch-1