Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • O openapi-generator
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 3,476
    • Issues 3,476
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 402
    • Merge requests 402
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Package Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • OpenAPI Tools
  • openapi-generator
  • Merge requests
  • !9354

[scala-sttp] Compilation failure URI parameter not camelCase

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Administrator requested to merge github/fork/softdevca/i9345 into master Apr 27, 2021
  • Overview 0
  • Commits 1
  • Pipelines 0
  • Changes 2

Created by: softdevca

scala-sttp generators would not compile when URI parameter names were not camelCase. Fixed by substituting the names in the URI with values from encodePath.

Test case added.

Fixes #9345 (closed)

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
  • File the PR against the correct branch: master, 5.1.x, 6.0.x
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.

cc @clasnake (2017/07), @jimschubert (2017/09) heart, @shijinkui (2018/01), @ramzimaalej (2018/03), @chameleon82 (2020/03), @Bouillie (2020/04)

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: github/fork/softdevca/i9345