Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • O openapi-generator
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 3,476
    • Issues 3,476
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 402
    • Merge requests 402
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Package Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • OpenAPI Tools
  • openapi-generator
  • Merge requests
  • !9799

Use Kotlin nullable operator for nullable properties

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Closed Administrator requested to merge github/fork/josh-bridge/kotlin-nullable-fields into 6.0.x Jun 17, 2021
  • Overview 0
  • Commits 5
  • Pipelines 0
  • Changes 124

Created by: josh-bridge

The previous check of isReadOnly was not applicable to whether a value should be null or not. As far as I can tell that is more to do with a RESTful design principal than to do with whether the code should present a models values as nullable. Initially I thought the ? should be removed if the value is set to required = true but it is important to note that required != non-null, i.e. the field can be required but the value might still be null (if nullable = true).

The default null value will no longer be supplied if the value is not nullable.

Also removed escaping of default string values (this would cause any default string value to be written to the file as val test = "value" instead of val test = "value".

This would clearly be a breaking change so have set it to a major release branch. Please let me know if you think it could actually go into a minor release.

[kotlin committee] @jimschubert @dr4ke616 @karismann @Zomzog @andrewemery @4brunu @yutaka0m

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
  • Run the following to build the project and update samples:
    ./mvnw clean package 
    ./bin/generate-samples.sh
    ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh
    Commit all changed files. This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master. These must match the expectations made by your contribution. You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*. For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH.
  • File the PR against the correct branch: master, 5.1.x, 6.0.x
  • If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request.
Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: github/fork/josh-bridge/kotlin-nullable-fields