Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • C create-react-app
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 1,547
    • Issues 1,547
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 417
    • Merge requests 417
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Package Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Meta
  • create-react-app
  • Merge requests
  • !9630

Emphasise that Next.js is capable of SSG

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Merged Administrator requested to merge github/fork/liamness/patch-1 into master Sep 12, 2020
  • Overview 4
  • Commits 1
  • Pipelines 0
  • Changes 1

Created by: liamness

This emphasises that Next.js is capable of static site generation. A lot of comparisons between the most popular React frameworks seem to go like this:

  • CRA is good for client-side SPAs
  • Gatsby is good for static sites
  • Next.js is good for server-rendered applications

So people who need static sites will typically always choose Gatsby. However, Next.js now supports static site generation - since earlier this year I think. So I feel this comparison should include that.

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: github/fork/liamness/patch-1