Mathjax-v2.2-feature-discussion.md

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ Apply to
 
 * incorporate Davide's amscd code.
 * investigate a LaTeX2e extra symbols extension. 
-* offer instiki syntax as input -> **not a priority** (instiki never exposes its TeX syntax but converts to MathML). fred: actually instiki just uses itex2MML and I think has an option to use blahtex. Both tools are open source so the syntax is known. peter: true but we should probably open up another section for "input processors"? fred: it's probably overkill to implement input processors for itex2MML or blahtex. They basically rely on the same LaTeX-like syntax as MathJax TeX input processor. Extensions to add LaTeX commands that are specific to these languages and not included in the default TeX input Jax sound more appropriate.
+* offer instiki syntax as input -> **not a priority** (instiki never exposes its TeX syntax but converts to MathML). fred: actually instiki just uses itex2MML and I think has an option to use blahtex. Both tools are open source so the syntax is known. peter: true but we should probably open up another section for "input processors"? fred: it's probably overkill to implement input processors for itex2MML or blahtex. They basically rely on the same LaTeX-like syntax as MathJax TeX input processor. Extensions to add LaTeX commands that are specific to these languages and not included in the default TeX input Jax sound more appropriate. peter: good point. I was also thinking about possibly different syntax, say maple, but that's out of the scope anyway.
 
 ### MathML support
 
@@ -102,4 +102,4 @@ Missing features (from [the documentation](http://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/mat
 
 Other topics
 * Improve line-breaking
-* Investigate Davide Carlisle's Content to Presentation xslt/javascript solution. fred: Perhaps we could do the conversion Content MathML => Presentation MathML in the MathML input Jax processor (maybe making this optional) and not necessarily using the XSLT (not sure whether it is available to all browsers).
+* Investigate Davide Carlisle's Content to Presentation xslt/javascript solution. fred: Perhaps we could do the conversion Content MathML => Presentation MathML in the MathML input Jax processor (maybe making this optional) and not necessarily using the XSLT (not sure whether it is available to all browsers). peter: sure, I don't know where it fits best. From what I can google, all our supported browsers do xslt 1.0 but I have no idea how performance is anyway.
\ No newline at end of file