Skip to content
GitLab

STIX feedback · Changes

Page history
Updated STIX feedback (markdown) authored by Davide P. Cervone's avatar Davide P. Cervone
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
STIX-feedback.md
View page @ 614898ac
......@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
* Some glyphs used for style (*-Bold, *-Italic, *-BoldItalic) and mathvariant (Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols unicode block for Bold, Italic, Bold Italic, Bold Script, Bold Fraktur, Sans Serif Bold, Sans Serif Italic, Sans Serif Bold Italic) are probably duplicate. Currently our Python script preserves all the glyphs while MathJax only needs a subset of them to implement the MathML mathvariant and style attributes.
* The symbol at U+1D98 (LATIN SMALL LETTER ESH WITH RETROFLEX HOOK) seems to be incorrect. It appears to be the glyph for U+1D9B (MODIFIER LETTER SMALL TURNED ALPHA)?
* The symbol at U+1D98 (LATIN SMALL LETTER ESH WITH RETROFLEX HOOK) seems to be incorrect. It appears to be the glyph for U+1D9B (MODIFIER LETTER SMALL TURNED ALPHA)? The glyph is correct in the STIXGeneral fonts.
* The combining characters in the larger sizes (found in STIXMath-Regular.otf) do not combine (they are not zero width), as they do in the normal sized versions. E.g., uni20D7.s1 should have right and left bearing both set at 0, with the glyph extending to the left of 0 (see U+20D7 in STIX-Regular.otf for reference). This is true of all the combining characters in size 1 thorough 5 in both Combining Diacritical Marks (U+0300 through U+036F except for U+0338) and Combining Diacritical Marks for Symbols (U+20D0 to U+20FF).
......