Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • B bootstrap
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 263
    • Issues 263
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 114
    • Merge requests 114
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Package Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Bootstrap
  • bootstrap
  • Merge requests
  • !31680

Add stale Action for old issues

  • Review changes

  • Download
  • Email patches
  • Plain diff
Closed Mark Otto requested to merge stale-action into main Sep 16, 2020
  • Overview 0
  • Commits 2
  • Pipelines 0
  • Changes 1

It seems a tad silly to keep old issues around that no one has touched in years. Opening this up for debate to keep things leaner here, but I'd like to see about closing issues more than two years old that have seen no new activity.

Should we go longer? Is one week's notice enough before fully closing?

/cc @twbs/team

Assignee
Assign to
Reviewers
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: stale-action